Plan
Project structure, BOQ, tasks and Gantt — engineered for construction, not generic PM. Schedules that respect cost codes and float paths.
BauLynq is the operating platform for construction firms — bids, projects, cashflow and site operations on one connected stack. From kickoff to handover, nothing falls through the cracks.
BauLynq replaces the spreadsheet sprawl with a coherent platform — every module owns its slice of the workflow and writes to the same ledger.
Project structure, BOQ, tasks and Gantt — engineered for construction, not generic PM. Schedules that respect cost codes and float paths.
From RFQ to award. Import the BOQ in any layout, price line-by-line, attach subcontractor quotes and ship a clean, traceable submission.
Excel-native progress billing, variations, retentions and certificates — generated the way your QS already works, not how a SaaS wants it.
Site reports, plant & machinery, attendance and payroll closed in one loop — operators on a tablet, controllers in the office, same data.
A construction project doesn’t fail at a stage — it fails at a handover. BauLynq is built around the handovers.
Import the client’s BOQ in any layout. Cost each line against your rate book, distribute to subcontractors, and ship a submission that’s defensible row-by-row.
# 1,247 lines · 14 sections
section "Earthworks"
item A.01 excavation, m³ → $12.40
item A.02 shoring, m² → $48.10
section "Concrete"
…
contract CT-2025-0148
parent_bid: BID-0214
start: 2026-01-12
WBS: auto-from-BOQ
cashflow: derived
The awarded bid becomes the project. WBS, cost codes, baseline schedule and cashflow are generated from the BOQ — no manual re-entry, no reconciliation calls.
Site engineers file daily reports on mobile. Plant moves are logged. Variations are raised against the contract. Everything closes into the project ledger overnight.
2026-03-14 · Crew 04 · Slab S-12
hours: 9.5
pour_m3: 42.3
variations: VAR-0207 (client-requested)
status: on plan
IPC #7 · CT-2025-0148
progress: 62.4%
variations: +$48,120
retention: $31,400
net_due: $214,880
export: excel · pdf
Interim payment certificates assemble themselves from approved progress. Retention, variations and previously certified amounts roll forward — the QS just signs.
A residential tower lives or dies by Kostenkontrolle. An infrastructure programme lives or dies by Ressourcenplanung. The workflow is the same shape — but the seam that hurts is different. BauLynq fits each.
Pain: Bauablaufplanung vs. cost ledger
Where the schedule and the cost ledger have to agree by Friday. BauLynq closes the BOQ, subcontracts and the IPC against the same Bauablauf — no parallel spreadsheets to reconcile.
Pain: Kostenkontrolle per unit
Unit-level cost control from kickoff. Committed vs incurred vs forecast per apartment, with the payment plan and broker commission already reconciled by the time the owner asks.
Pain: Ressourcenplanung across sections
Crew, plant and material allocated across multiple sections, planned against a critical path that actually reflects the BOQ. Milestone IPCs without the month-end fire drill.
Pain: Übergabe-Dossier from day one
EPC delivery built around the handover dossier from day one — instrumentation lists, FAT/SAT records and as-builts converging on a single source the owner can actually sign.
Three handovers that quietly burn a project. Three concrete places BauLynq stops the leak.
Friday afternoon, the QS is rebuilding the BOQ in Excel to match a Bauablauf that already moved twice this week — and the IPC goes out Monday.
The Bauablauf, the BOQ and the IPC are the same object — move a milestone, the cost ledger and the certificate recalculate in place.
Month-end closes in 2 days instead of 10, and the numbers actually agree the first time.
The Bauleiter is texting the project office about a crane move that was planned for section B, but section A is still pouring — and nobody told the NU.
Crew, Geräte and NU schedules sit on the same critical path as the BOQ; a shift on site reflows the plan and pings the affected subcontractor automatically.
Plant idle time drops ~30%, and the next Aufmaß lines up with the crew that actually built the work.
Six weeks before Übergabe, someone realises the Mängel list, the as-builts and the FAT/SAT records live in three different inboxes — and the Sicherheitseinbehalt won't release without them.
Every Tagesbericht, Nachtrag and inspection writes directly into the Übergabe-Dossier from day one — the document assembles itself as the project runs.
Handover ships on the contract date, Sicherheitseinbehalt is released within the month, and there is no scramble for paperwork that should have existed all along.
Three seams. One platform. The project that arrives at handover is the one you priced at tender.
“Our month-end used to take ten days of spreadsheets and phone calls. With BauLynq we close in two — and the numbers actually agree .”
Tell us about your portfolio — project types, stack you’re replacing, and the seam that hurts most. We’ll come back with a working session, not a sales call.